Chinese Court Dismisses Lawsuit Over Dowry and Engagement Gifts in 'Mountain City Marriage Case'
The recent announcement from the Yang High People's Court in China has declared that the lawsuit filed by the family of the man convicted in the "Mountain City Marriage Case" has been dismissed. The plaintiff had sued the defendant, demanding the return of the dowry and the engagement gifts. However, the court found that the gifts were not given under coercion and were returned after the lawsuit was filed, making the plaintiff's demands unjustified.
29 March 2024
The case dates back to January 2023 when the man, identified as Mr. Zhang, and the woman, identified as Ms. Wang, were introduced to each other through a matchmaking agency. They began dating and eventually got engaged. However, the engagement was short-lived as the woman accused the man of sexually assaulting her during their engagement party. The man was later arrested and charged with sexual assault. The woman's family returned the engagement gifts and dowry to the man's family after the lawsuit was filed.
However, the man's family insisted that the gifts were given under coercion and that they should be returned. The man's mother even took to social media to express her frustration and disappointment with the court's decision. The court, however, found that the gifts were given voluntarily and were not given under any form of coercion. The woman's family returned the gifts after the lawsuit was filed, indicating that they did not consider the gifts to be their property. The court also noted that the man's family had not provided any evidence to prove that the gifts were given under coercion. The case has sparked a heated debate on social media, with many people expressing their opinions on the matter. Some people argue that the woman's family should return the gifts as they were given in the context of an engagement. Others argue that the gifts were given voluntarily and should not be returned. This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding between parties involved in a relationship. It also underscores the need for evidence in legal proceedings. Without evidence, it is difficult to prove the validity of a claim, and the court cannot make an informed decision. The court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the man's family is a reminder that legal proceedings require concrete evidence to support a claim. The court cannot make a decision based solely on the word of one party. In this case, the woman's family returned the gifts after the lawsuit was filed, indicating that they did not consider the gifts to be their property.
In conclusion, the recent decision by the Yang High People's Court to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the family of the man convicted in the "Mountain City Marriage Case" is a reminder that legal proceedings require concrete evidence to support a claim. The court cannot make a decision based solely on the word of one party. The case also highlights the need for clear communication and understanding between parties involved in a relationship.