Qianhe 0 Soy Sauce Embroiled in Misleading Labeling Controversy
A recent controversy has erupted over the "Qianhe 0" brand of soy sauce, which has been found to contain detectable amounts of cadmium, a toxic element. The issue has sparked debate among consumers, with some claiming that the brand's labeling is misleading. At the center of the controversy is the meaning of the "Qianhe 0" logo, which some consumers have assumed implies "zero additives." However, an investigation has revealed that "Qianhe 0" is simply a registered trademark of Qianhe Food Co., Ltd., and does not necessarily indicate that the product is free of additives.

20 March 2025
The controversy began when a consumer magazine sent 13 samples of soy sauce, including the Qianhe 0 brand, to a third-party testing agency for analysis. The results showed that 12 of the samples, including Qianhe 0, contained detectable amounts of cadmium, while 7 samples contained total arsenic. The Qianhe 0 soy sauce was found to contain 0.0110 mg/kg of cadmium. Lawyers have weighed in on the issue, stating that while the registration of the "Qianhe 0" trademark is not itself unlawful, the company's use of the logo in conjunction with claims of "zero additives" may be misleading to consumers.
According to Chen Liang, director of Hubei Haoli Law Firm, the issue lies not with the trademark itself, but with the potential for misleading marketing practices. By emphasizing the "zero additive" aspect of the product, the manufacturer may be creating a false impression among consumers, who may not take the time to carefully read the ingredient label. This raises concerns about the transparency and accuracy of the product's labeling and advertising. The company's customer service department has responded to inquiries, stating that the "Qianhe 0" logo is a registered trademark and a brand identifier, but has not directly addressed whether it implies zero additives.
The controversy surrounding the "Qianhe 0" soy sauce highlights the need for clearer guidelines and regulations on food labeling and advertising. As consumers become increasingly health-conscious and demanding of transparency, manufacturers must be held to higher standards of accountability and accuracy in their marketing practices. The incident also underscores the importance of vigilant consumer advocacy and the role of social media in holding companies accountable for their actions. In conclusion, for a brand like Qianhe, it is imperative to clarify the true meaning of the "Qianhe 0" trademark as soon as possible to avoid misleading consumers. Furthermore, consumers should be more vigilant when purchasing products, paying close attention to packaging labels and ingredient lists to ensure their rights are protected.
Comments

