Ride-Hailing Driver Earns Meager $57 After Two Weeks, Exposing Exploitative Labor Practices
A recent incident in Changsha has come to light where a man earned a meager 400 yuan ($57) after driving for a ride-hailing company for over two weeks, despite generating a revenue of 4,600 yuan during this period. The company's contractual terms and hefty deductions left the driver with a paltry sum, raising questions about the fairness and transparency of the company's treatment of its drivers. This case has sparked intense scrutiny over the contractual arrangements between drivers and the platforms they work for, with many accusing the company of exploiting its workers and engaging in unfair labor practices.

14 March 2025
Mr. Zhang, a resident of Changsha, signed a three-month contract with Longsha Dida New Energy Automobile Service Co., Ltd. to work as an online ride-hailing driver. Before signing the contract, the company's customer service informed him that he would only need to work 8 hours a day, with an hourly income of 40-50 yuan, and that he could earn a minimum of 170 yuan in dividends after completing the daily target of 298 yuan in business. However, Mr. Zhang soon discovered that the reality was far from the company's promises. He often had to start working at 5 am to charge his car and would only finish his shift at 11 pm, with barely any time to rest. Despite working long hours, he found that the number of orders assigned to him was limited, and he could only barely meet the daily target by working over 12 hours a day.
After working for 15 days, Mr. Zhang decided to quit and return the car, citing concerns about his physical health. According to the platform's data, Mr. Zhang's total business income for the 15 days was 4,613 yuan, which meant he had met the daily target every day. However, when the company settled his income, they deducted various fees, including a 3,000 yuan penalty for terminating the contract early, and only paid him 418 yuan. The company explained that the customer service's promise of an hourly income of 40-50 yuan was based on normal platform data, but the actual income could be affected by various factors such as regional differences. They also claimed that Mr. Zhang was a new driver and therefore was assigned fewer and less lucrative orders.
Lawyer Yao Zhitou from Beijing argues that Mr. Zhang's demand for a refund has a certain degree of reasonableness, and the company should not unilaterally deduct the penalty. Yao emphasizes that the contract between Mr. Zhang and the company was essentially a labor contract, and that the company's deduction of the penalty was not in line with the relevant laws and regulations. According to the Labor Contract Law in China, employers must provide employees with a written contract that outlines the terms of employment, including job responsibilities, working hours, remuneration, and termination conditions. If the relationship between the ride-hailing company and the driver is indeed deemed a labor contract, the company would be legally obligated to adhere to the law's provisions, including the payment of wages as agreed upon in the contract.

The incident raises significant questions about the fairness of the company's practices and the legality of the penalty. Yao suggests that Mr. Zhang could take legal action to challenge the company's decision and seek a refund. The legal community's perspective on this issue highlights the need for stricter enforcement of labor laws in the gig economy. As the ride-hailing industry continues to grow, it is imperative that the legal rights of drivers are safeguarded, ensuring they receive fair compensation and treatment under the law.

The case of Mr. Zhang highlights the plight of many drivers who face unfair treatment from companies. Mr. Zhang can seek legal recourse by filing a lawsuit to revoke the termination agreement and demanding a refund of part of the deposit, thereby safeguarding his rights. This incident has sparked public concern and discussion about the need for stricter regulations to protect the rights of laborers, including those working in the gig economy. Experts emphasize that protecting labor rights and improving work efficiency are crucial for achieving high-quality development, but this requires a gradual process rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. As the debate surrounding the protection of labor rights continues, it is essential to prioritize the welfare of workers and ensure that their rights are respected. By doing so, we can promote a more equitable and sustainable work environment that benefits both employees and employers. Ultimately, the key to resolving these issues lies in striking a balance between economic development and social responsibility, and it is crucial that we approach this challenge with a long-term, objective, and comprehensive perspective.
Comments

Share this article
Related Articles

Lutein Candy Warning: 8-Year-Old Boy Develops Dry Eye Syndrome
By Trending on Weibo
Tech
14 Mar 2025

Huawei's Sneak Peek: Unveiling the Mysterious 1610 Device
By Trending on Weibo
Tech
14 Mar 2025

Ride-Hailing Driver Earns Meager $57 After Two Weeks, Exposing Exploitative Labor Practices
By Trending on Weibo
Tech
14 Mar 2025

The Homogenization of Social Media: Are We Losing Our Unique Selves Online?
By Trending on Weibo
Tech
13 Mar 2025

Daniel Wu's English Course Sells Over $750,000 in 5 Days
By Trending on Weibo
Tech
11 Mar 2025