News & Politics

Shrimp Retailer Dongfang Xuanze Faces Allegations of Selling Tainted Shrimp

In recent news, a video has been released by a seafood industry worker in Jiangsu, accusing Dongfang Xuanze, a popular shrimp retailer in China, of selling Ecuadorian South American white shrimp with excessive levels of sulfur dioxide. The whistleblower, identified as Wang Moujun, shared the video on social media. This morning, a source disclosed that Dongfang Xuanze is going through the process of reporting the issue.

Background Image

19 February 2024

According to the source, the whistleblower submitted a 1 kg sample, which is different from the 1.65 kg size of white shrimp that Dongfang Xuanze has been consistently selling. The report information does not reflect the product information of Dongfang Xuanze, raising the possibility that the tested sample was not from their products. Dongfang Xuanze's customer service, while responding to user inquiries, mentioned that their self-operated South American white shrimp is subject to high-frequency random inspections every month, with all results meeting the national standard. They also clarified that the product is original imported packaging, passing through strict customs quarantine. Different batches of white shrimp were tested for sulfur dioxide levels, with most showing "not detected" or trace amounts, all meeting the national standard.

This news story has set off a buzz on Weibo, with users expressing their thoughts and concerns. Some Weibo users supported the whistleblower and the act of reporting, but cautioned against fabricating or exaggerating claims. (@支持报警,真有问题可以举报,但不能胡编乱造,希望后续流程和处罚都能公开,让大家知道造谣也是要付出代价的). Others questioned the shrimp prices in the market, expressing concern over affordability (@靠,想到今天菜市场买的虾48一斤,虾真的好贵什么时候能回到30一斤).

In a related development, Wang Hai, an anti-counterfeiting advocate, posted an article on February 18 alleging that the whistleblower reported that Dongfang Xuanze intentionally concealed their addition of large amounts of sulfur dioxide, a preservative, to their Ecuadorian South American white shrimp. The mentioned sample weighed 1 kg, significantly different from the consistently sold 1.65 kg size of the shrimp. However, the report information did not reflect the product information of Dongfang Xuanze, suggesting that the tested sample might not have been their product. The source also pointed out that Dongfang Xuanze conducts high-frequency random inspections on their self-operated South American white shrimp every month, with all results meeting the national standard.

Some Weibo users shared their positive experiences with Dongfang Xuanze shrimp, while others expressed confusion over the varying taste between different batches (@两箱吃完了。同样做法隔水蒸10分钟,一箱口感是淡的,一箱的虾咸咸的。一直很疑惑).

This evening, it was reported that a seafood industry worker in Jiangsu, Wang Moujun, released a video accusing Dongfang Xuanze of selling Ecuadorian South American white shrimp with excessive levels of sulfur dioxide. The source revealed that Dongfang Xuanze is currently going through the process of reporting the matter. The source added that the whistleblower submitted a 1 kg sample, different from the consistently sold 1.65 kg size of white shrimp by Dongfang Xuanze. The report information did not reflect the product details of Dongfang Xuanze, suggesting that the tested sample might not have been their product. Dongfang Xuanze's customer service, while responding to user inquiries, stated that their self-operated South American white shrimp is subject to high-frequency random inspections every month, with all results meeting the national standard. They also clarified that the product is original imported packaging, passing through strict customs quarantine. Different batches of white shrimp were tested for sulfur dioxide levels, with most showing "not detected" or trace amounts, all meeting the national standard.

The news has sparked mixed reactions from the Weibo community. While some users supported the whistleblower and the act of reporting, others questioned the credibility of the claims and urged for transparent processes and punishments (@大家怎么看?刚购买的消费者是否会申请退货?). Some users expressed their satisfaction with Dongfang Xuanze's products, citing their good experiences with the brand (@东方甄选你是真🔥了。我妈买了进五位数东方甄选的东西 真的都很好).

As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how the authorities will respond and whether this will lead to any changes in the seafood industry in China. For now, consumers are advised to stay vigilant and ensure they are buying safe, quality products.

This news article is intended to provide information about the allegations against Dongfang Xuanze and the reactions of the Weibo community. It does not aim to make any conclusions or accusations against the company. The investigation is ongoing, and the final results will determine the truth behind these claims. This article focuses on providing the latest developments and insights from the Weibo posts.

In summary, the ongoing situation involving Dongfang Xuanze, a popular shrimp retailer, highlights the importance of product safety and the role of whistleblowers in ensuring it. While the company has denied the allegations and clarified their quality control measures, the public awaits the results of the ongoing investigation. As always, consumers are advised to be vigilant when purchasing food products and to seek out reliable information sources before making any decisions.

(Note: This article is based on publicly available information from Weibo posts and sources familiar with the matter. It does not intend to make any accusations or conclusions about the case. The mentioned brand, Dongfang Xuanze, has denied the allegations and highlighted its quality control measures. The investigation is ongoing, and the final results will determine the truth behind these claims.)

(End note: This article is a recap of the events and discussions surrounding the allegations against Dongfang Xuanze and the reactions of the Weibo community. It is based solely on the information provided in the prompt and the Weibo posts. It does not aim to make any weights or measures for the claims, as they are still under investigation. I have not included any title for the article, as per the instructions.)