Social Media Influencer Knife Little Knife Embroiled in Contract Dispute and Detention Over Unpaid 4 Million Yuan Compensation
Recently, social media influencer "Knife Little Knife" has been at the center of controversy after being taken away for investigation due to owing over 4 million yuan in breach of contract compensation. The incident has sparked heated discussions online, with many netizens expressing surprise and reflecting on the risks and realities of being a social media influencer. According to reports, Knife Little Knife, whose real name is Gao Jingjing, had a contract dispute with a cultural company in Anhui Province in 2021, resulting in a court ruling that ordered her to pay over 4 million yuan in compensation and damages. Despite having the ability to pay, Knife Little Knife refused to do so and was subsequently added to the list of dishonest debtors.
4 April 2025
Dāo Xiǎo Dāo, once a household name on the internet, was famously known as the "Queen of Disguise" for her versatile videos that garnered widespread attention. However, recent events have seemingly landed her in troubled waters. According to discussions on Weibo, a popular Chinese social media platform, Dāo Xiǎo Dāo continued to publish content up until her detention, leaving fans and followers with unanswered questions about her situation. The controversy surrounding Dāo Xiǎo Dāo escalated when her former agency publicly disclosed that she had been taken into custody for investigation, which they attributed to her failure to pay a substantial contract termination compensation, amounting to over 4 million yuan.
This dramatic turn of events has not only marred Dāo Xiǎo Dāo's reputation but has also raised questions about the contractual obligations and financial dealings within the entertainment industry, particularly concerning influencers and content creators. As the investigation unfolds, it remains to be seen how this will impact Dāo Xiǎo Dāo's career and public image, as well as the broader implications for social media personalities navigating the complexities of fame, finance, and legal responsibilities in China.
Netizens are warning new social media influencers to be cautious when signing contracts with MCN agencies, advising them to carefully review the contract, ask questions, and ensure all agreements are written into the contract to avoid potential disputes. They also warn about the existence of fake or unaffiliated agencies using the names of reputable MCNs to lure new influencers into signing contracts. The warning from netizens emphasizes the importance of being cautious and vigilant when dealing with MCN agencies, as some may offer attractive conditions but have hidden pitfalls.
The situation has significant implications for the cooperation dynamics between social media influencers and MCN agencies, highlighting the potential risks and consequences that influencers may face when signing contracts with such agencies, particularly if they are not fully aware of the terms and conditions. The incident serves as a warning to social media influencers to be cautious when signing contracts with MCN agencies, and it may lead to increased scrutiny of MCN agencies and their business practices. In the long term, this incident may lead to a shift in the way influencers and MCN agencies negotiate contracts, resulting in more influencer-friendly contract terms and contributing to a more transparent and equitable industry.
Comments
