Extending School Hours: A Solution for Working Parents or a Threat to Childhood?
A recent proposal by a Shenzhen parent to extend elementary school hours until 6:30 PM has sparked a heated debate on the People's Network comment board. The parent argued that the current early dismissal time is inconvenient for working parents who are unable to pick up their children on time. This suggestion has garnered significant attention and elicited a range of responses from the public, with some supporting the idea and others opposing it. The parent who made the suggestion cited the difficulty of balancing work and family responsibilities, particularly for dual-income households. With many parents working until 6:00 PM or later, the early dismissal time of elementary schools can create a challenge in ensuring children are safely picked up and cared for.

9 April 2025
The proposal aims to address this issue by aligning the school day more closely with the typical working hours of parents, thereby reducing the need for external childcare arrangements and the associated costs and worries. Some parents have expressed support for the proposal, citing the benefits of extended school hours for their work-life balance and the potential for children to engage in more extracurricular activities or receive additional academic support. This perspective emphasizes the practical advantages of having schools provide care and supervision until a later hour, mirroring the schedules of many working adults. However, others are concerned about the potential negative impacts of extended school hours on both teachers and students. Teachers might face increased workload and stress, potentially affecting the quality of education they can provide. For students, longer school days could mean less time for rest, personal interests, and family interactions, potentially impacting their overall well-being and development.
The Education Bureau of Bao'an District, Shenzhen, has responded to the proposal by stating that the standard after-school service time is until 6:00 PM. For situations requiring later pickup, schools are to make appropriate arrangements. This response indicates a willingness to accommodate the needs of working parents while also considering the operational constraints and potential impacts on students and staff. Many have taken to social media to express their opinions, with some suggesting that parents should take on more responsibility rather than relying solely on schools. They argue that parents should be more involved in their children's lives, providing them with the necessary care and attention, rather than expecting schools to extend their hours. Others have pointed out that the issue is not just about school hours, but also about societal expectations and the role of parents in their children's education and care.
Some have questioned the notion of extending school hours, citing the importance of personal time for children, which is essential for their physical and mental well-being. Outdoor activities and parent-child interactions are vital for a child's development, and excessive school hours could limit these opportunities. There are also concerns that if schools were to extend their hours, it could lead to a lack of balance between school, family, and personal time for children. Ultimately, the proposal has ignited a necessary discussion about the balance between school, family, and personal time for children. As discussions around this issue continue, it will be essential to weigh the various perspectives and consider the long-term effects on education, family life, and societal well-being. Many have suggested alternative solutions, such as adjusting work schedules to align with school hours or utilizing after-school services that cater to working parents' needs. The search for a solution that balances the needs of all stakeholders remains a pressing concern, with the community looking for a pragmatic approach that supports working parents while ensuring the educational and personal development of children.