X

According to the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the revision is based on the changing demographic landscape of China, where an increasing number of people are moving to different cities for work or education. The current requirement of providing a household registration booklet has been criticized for being outdated and restrictive, as it often required individuals to return to their hometown to register for marriage or divorce.

The revised draft also introduces a "cooling-off period" for divorce, which requires couples to wait for a certain period of time before their divorce can be finalized. The move is intended to reduce impulsive divorces and promote more stable marriages. However, the proposal has been met with skepticism by many on social media, who argue that it infringes upon individual freedom and the right to divorce.

One Weibo user, @, commented, "Isn't this a restriction on personal freedom? We're adults, and we should be responsible for our own actions. Why do you need to intervene?" Another user, @, sarcastically suggested that the government should also introduce a "cooling-off period" for marriage, saying, "How about introducing a one-month cooling-off period for marriage? If the couple changes their mind within that period, the marriage can be canceled."

Some users also pointed out the double standard in the government's approach, noting that while there are restrictions on divorce, there are no similar restrictions on marriage. @ commented, "Why can't we have a cooling-off period for marriage? Wouldn't that reduce the number of impulsive marriages and subsequently reduce impulsive divorces?"

The proposal has also sparked a wider debate about the role of government in regulating personal relationships. While some argue that the government should play a more active role in promoting stable marriages and families, others believe that individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices.

The Ministry of Civil Affairs has argued that the revised draft is intended to promote more stable marriages and reduce the number of impulsive divorces. However, the proposal has clearly struck a nerve among many on social media, who are exercising their right to free speech to express their opinions on the matter.

As the debate continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the government will respond to the concerns raised by the public. One thing is certain, however: the proposal has sparked a much-needed conversation about the role of government in regulating personal relationships and the importance of individual freedom.