Mother of Xiaomi SU7 Crash Victim Demands Action from CEO Lei Jun

However, the mother of one of the victims has publicly called on Lei Jun to "say what he means and do what he says," implying that the company's response has been inadequate. As the news of the SU7 accident spread, online communities were filled with a myriad of reactions and speculations. Commenters pointed out the distinction between the car doors being locked and the explosion, suggesting that the focus should not solely be on whether the doors were locked but rather on the broader safety measures of the vehicle. Others discussed the potential issue with the car doors, specifically how they might not open due to the lack of electricity post-collision, pointing to the differences in door mechanisms between traditional fuel cars and electric vehicles like the SU7.

On April 1st, Lei Jun finally responded to the tragic accident in a Weibo post, expressing his deepest condolences to the families of the victims and assuring the public that Xiaomi would cooperate fully with the investigation and provide support to the families. However, the mother of one of the victims responded to Lei Jun's post, saying "I hope you will do what you say," reflecting the skepticism and frustration that many people feel towards companies' responses to tragedies, and the desire for concrete actions rather than just words. Lei Jun's response was seen as an attempt to address the public's concerns and show that Xiaomi is taking the incident seriously, but the incident has sparked a heated debate on social media, with many people questioning the safety of Xiaomi's vehicles and the company's response to the tragedy.

The accident has raised numerous questions and concerns about the safety and reliability of intelligent driving systems. The lack of communication from Xiaomi to the families of the victims has been perceived as insensitive and has further fueled public outrage. The effectiveness of the NOA intelligent driving system has also been called into question, as the system's ability to detect obstacles and respond in a timely manner has been criticized. The vehicle's failure to detect the water cement barrier and respond accordingly has raised questions about the system's ability to handle unexpected situations. The lack of transparency from Xiaomi regarding the investigation and the company's response to the accident has also been criticized.

The incident has sparked a wider discussion about the risks and benefits of intelligent driving systems. While these systems have the potential to improve road safety, they are not foolproof and can be vulnerable to errors and malfunctions. The need for greater transparency, accountability, and regulation in the development and deployment of these systems has been emphasized. Ultimately, the accident serves as a reminder of the importance of prioritizing safety and responsibility in the development and deployment of intelligent driving systems. Companies like Xiaomi must be held accountable for the safety of their products and must prioritize transparency and communication with the public, particularly in the event of accidents. The incident has significant implications for the development of the intelligent driving industry, and it is essential that lessons are learned from this tragedy to prevent similar accidents from occurring in the future.